GLOBAL TENDENCIES IN NUCLEAR POWER ENGINEERING

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/geotech2022.36.01

Keywords:

nuclear energy, reactor, pace of development, exhaustion of technological capabilities, raw material base, nuclear safety and security, fusion, small modular reactors

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the analytical inspection and parameterization of the dynamics of the world’s nuclear energy complex from the first selfsustaining chain reaction to the present day. The rapid development of nuclear power in the 1970s and 1980s slowed down significantly at the beginning of the third millennium. The dynamics of increasing operational capacities is a linear unfolding of the completed turn of the spiral of development. Almost 90 % of electricity in the nuclear power industry in 1970–2021 was generated by PWR and BWR light water reactors. It is expected that their technological resources will be exhausted by 99 % by 2077. If the current pace of development is maintained, the share of electricity generated by NPPs in the world by that time will decrease to 1,5 %. Nuclear power capacities in Europe and America are declining, while is developing in Asia, particularly in China, where almost 70 % of the nuclear power plants under construction are located. The rate of decline in uranium production indicates to by 2040 no more than half of the world’s nuclear fuel demand will be met. Safety and security of the nuclear energy complex are considerably decreasing with the growth of reactor capacity, and the discrepancy between the calculated and observed probabilities of a severe radiation accident reaches two orders of magnitude. As a result of current manifestation of great-power nuclear terrorism, the global nuclear safety and security system needs to be overhauled. Further development of the nuclear energy requires a “technological leap”. At present, there is no technology available for widespread implementation that could increase nuclear reactor capacity by an order of magnitude without compromising nuclear safety, especially considering that fusion reactor technology is unlikely to be widely implemented in the next few decades. A technological bridge between existing and future developments could serve small modular reactors which in the short term could mitigate the energy supply shortage.

References

Ферми Э. Я дерные процессы при больших энергиях. Успехи физических наук. 1952. Т. 46, № 1. С. 71–95.

Z inn W. E. (1955). Fermi and Atomic Energy. Review of Modern Physics 27: 263–268. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.27.263.

Энергетика: история, настоящее и будущее. Т. 3. Развитие тепловой и ядерной энергетики / под ред. И.Н. Карпа, И.Я. Сигала, Е.П. Домбровской. Киев, 2008. 528 с.

Кошарна O.П. Аварія на АЕС «Фукусіма-1» та її вплив на перспективи розвитку ядерної енергетики в Україні та світ. Вісник експортного контролю. 2011. № 2. С. 4–6.

Glossary of Terms in PRIS Reports. URL: https://pris.iaea.org/PRIS /Glossary.aspx.

W orld Nuclear Association. URL: https://world-nuclear.org/.

I AEA Power Reactor Information System. URL: https://pris.iaea.org/.

Долін В.В., Пушкарьов О.В., Шраменко І.Ф. та ін. Тритій у біосфері.-Київ: Наукова думка, 2012.- 224 с.

Азаренков Н.А., Булавин Л.А., Залюбовский И.И. Ядерная энергетика : учебное пособие. Харьков : ХНУ имени В.Н. Каразина, 2012. 535 с.

IT ER: L’ÉNERGIE DE FUSIO N. URL: https://www.iter.org/fr/accueil.

Nuclear fusion. Postnote. January 2003. No 192. URL: http://www.parliament.uk/post/pn192.pdf.

Крылова В.П., Куличенко В.В. Обращение с отходами от переработки облученного ядерного горючего. Атомная техника за рубежом. 1974. № 2. С. 37.

Uranium 2020: Resources, Production and Demand. NEA (No 7551), IAEA, 2020. 484 p.

HSE Health and Safety Executive, Nuclear Directorate, Generic Design Assessment – New Civil Reactors Build, Step 3, PSA of the EDF and Areva UK EPR division 6, Assessment report n° AR 09/027-P, 2011.

L évêque François. The risk of a major nuclear accident: calculation and perception of probabilities. 2013. ffhal-00795152v2f. 39 p.

B enjamin K. Sovacool (2011). Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power: A Critical Global Assessment of Atomic Energy, World Scientific, 296 p.

I AEA Incident and Trafficking Database (ITDB ). URL: https://www.iaea.org/resources/databases/itdb.

D olin V., Kopylenko O., Zabulonov Yu. GLOB AL NUCLEAR THREATS CAUSED BY RUSSI A’S INVASIO N OF UKRAINE. Geochemistry of Technogenesis. 2022. No 7. P. 7–17.

S tatus and Trends in Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NW-T-1.14 (Rev. 1). Vienna: IAEA, 2022. 102 p.

D emocracy Index 2021. The China challenge. The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited, 2022. 85 p.

Energy, Electricity and Nuclear Power Estimates for the Period up to 2050: 2021 edition. Vienna : IAEA, 2021. 148 p.

Published

2023-05-23